Equitable Distribution Lawyer Near Me
When a marriage ends and property needs to be divided, Virginia law follows the principle of equitable distribution—not a fifty-fifty split, but a fair division based on the specific circumstances of your marriage. If you have been searching for an equitable distribution lawyer near you, understanding how the court classifies marital and separate property under Va. Code § 20-107.3 is a critical first step. Mr. Sris, Owner and Founder of Law Offices Of SRIS, P.C., has handled property division matters since 1997 and brings firsthand insight to the process. Reach Law Offices Of SRIS, P.C. at (888) 437-7747 to request a consultation about your property division concerns. Law Offices Of SRIS, P.C. – Advocacy Without Borders.
On This Page
ToggleWhat Equitable Distribution Means in Virginia
Virginia is not a community property state. The court divides marital assets equitably—meaning fairly, not necessarily equally. Under Va. Code § 20-107.3, the court evaluates eleven statutory factors to determine a fair distribution. These factors include the duration of the marriage, each spouse’s contributions to the family’s well-being and to the acquisition of property, the circumstances that led to the dissolution of the marriage, the age and health of each party, and the tax consequences of any proposed division.
The first step in any equitable distribution case is classifying property as marital, separate, or hybrid. Marital property generally includes assets acquired during the marriage by either spouse, regardless of whose name is on the title. Separate property includes assets owned before the marriage, inheritances, and gifts from third parties. Hybrid property—such as a business started before the marriage that grew significantly during the marriage—requires careful valuation to separate the marital and separate components. Mr. Sris and his Of Counsel work with forensic accountants and business valuators in complex cases to establish accurate classifications and valuations.
How Mr. Sris and His Of Counsel Handle Equitable Distribution Cases
Equitable distribution often involves more than simply dividing a bank account. Retirement accounts, pension plans, stock options, real estate holdings, and business interests each present distinct valuation and division challenges. Mr. Sris’s background in accounting and information systems provides a practical foundation for analyzing financial records, tracing the source of funds, and identifying marital property that may be commingled with separate assets.
When a case cannot be resolved by agreement, the court requires a detailed evidentiary record. The firm works with clients to gather financial documentation, prepare property schedules, and present evidence supporting the classification and valuation of each asset. Mr. Sris testified before the Virginia House Courts of Justice Committee in support of 2019 HB 635 (chief patron Del. David Bulova), the legislation that revised subsection (g) of Va. Code § 20-107.3, addressing pension and retirement plan division. That legislative experience gives him a thorough understanding of how the equitable distribution statute is applied in practice.
About Mr. Sris and the Firm’s Of Counsel Attorneys
Mr. Sris is a former prosecutor who founded Law Offices Of SRIS, P.C. in 1997. He is admitted in Virginia, Maryland, the District of Columbia, New Jersey, and New York. His practice includes complex family law matters, and he accepts a limited number of cases to maintain direct involvement in each matter. The firm’s Of Counsel attorneys bring additional experience to family law cases, allowing the firm to handle matters that require coordinated effort across multiple courtrooms. Mr. Sris and the firm’s Of Counsel attorneys bring extensive combined legal experience. Results may vary.
Whether your property division involves a family business, a professional practice, retirement benefits, or real estate, the firm’s approach is methodical: classify, value, and seek a fair resolution. To discuss your situation, reach Mr. Sris and the firm’s Of Counsel attorneys at (888) 437-7747.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Virginia a community property state for divorce?
No, Virginia is an equitable distribution state, not a community property state. The court divides marital property based on fairness under Va. Code § 20-107.3, considering eleven statutory factors rather than applying a rigid fifty-fifty formula. Separate property—assets owned before the marriage, inheritances, and gifts from third parties—is generally excluded from division, though any increase in value of separate property that resulted from marital effort may be subject to equitable distribution. The distinction between marital and separate property is often the central dispute in a Virginia divorce.
What types of property are subject to equitable distribution in Virginia?
Marital property includes most assets acquired by either spouse during the marriage, regardless of how title is held. This encompasses real estate, bank accounts, retirement accounts, pensions, stock options, business interests, vehicles, and household goods. Debts incurred during the marriage are also subject to equitable apportionment. Property acquired before the marriage, along with inheritances and gifts received individually, is classified as separate property. The classification step is often the most contested part of an equitable distribution case, and the outcome depends heavily on the specific facts of your financial history.
How does a court value a business in a Virginia divorce?
Business valuation in a Virginia divorce is typically performed by a forensic accountant or certified business valuator who determines the fair market value of the enterprise. If the business was started during the marriage, the entire value is presumptively marital. If the business existed before the marriage, the valuator must separate the pre-marital value from any growth that occurred during the marriage. Factors such as goodwill, revenue trends, and market conditions are analyzed. The court then applies the § 20-107.3 factors to determine how the business interest is distributed. Results may vary.
Can a prenuptial agreement override equitable distribution in Virginia?
Yes, a valid prenuptial or postnuptial agreement can override the default equitable distribution rules in Virginia. If the agreement was entered into voluntarily and with full financial disclosure, the court generally enforces its terms regarding property division. However, agreements that are found to be unconscionable or signed under duress may be set aside. A properly drafted agreement can specify which assets remain separate and how marital property is divided, offering predictability that the statutory factors alone cannot provide.
What role does fault play in equitable distribution in Virginia?
Fault can be a factor in equitable distribution under Virginia law. While Virginia allows for no-fault divorce after a period of separation, fault grounds such as adultery or cruelty can affect the division of property. Under Va. Code § 20-107.3, the court may consider the circumstances that contributed to the dissolution of the marriage—including marital misconduct—when determining an equitable division. A finding of fault does not automatically result in a greater share of the marital estate for the other spouse, but it is one of the eleven factors the court evaluates.
How do I find an equitable distribution lawyer near me in Virginia?
Start by identifying an attorney who is experienced in Virginia equitable distribution law and familiar with the local Circuit Court where your divorce will be filed. Equitable distribution matters are heard in the Circuit Court of the county or city where either spouse resides. Law Offices Of SRIS, P.C. serves clients across Virginia from its Fairfax Location and other location locations. Mr. Sris and the firm’s Of Counsel attorneys appear in Circuit Courts throughout the Commonwealth. To request a consultation, contact Law Offices Of SRIS, P.C. at (888) 437-7747.
Last reviewed: July 2026
Reviewed by Mr. Sris, Owner and Founder
Admitted in Virginia, Maryland, District of Columbia, New Jersey, and New York
Practicing since 1997
Attorney advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Results may vary. Case results depend on a variety of factors unique to each case.