Use of a Firearm in Crime of Violence lawyer Near Me

Federal charges for using a firearm in a crime of violence are prosecuted actively by U.S. Attorney’s Offices in the Eastern and Western Districts of Virginia, the District of Maryland, the District of Columbia, the District of New Jersey, and the several New York federal districts. These charges carry severe consequences — including mandatory consecutive prison time — and the government often brings them alongside underlying violent‑crime or drug‑trafficking counts. Early engagement with an experienced federal criminal defense team is critical. Mr. Sris and the firm’s Of Counsel attorneys at Law Offices Of SRIS, P.C. represent clients facing firearm‑in‑crime‑of‑violence charges in federal courts across all five jurisdictions. For a consultation, call (888) 437‑7747. Law Offices Of SRIS, P.C. – Advocacy Without Borders.

On This Page

What Federal Use of a Firearm in Crime of Violence Means in Virginia, Maryland, DC, New Jersey, and New York

Under 18 U.S.C. § 924(c), anyone who uses or carries a firearm during and in relation to any crime of violence or drug trafficking crime faces additional, consecutive mandatory incarceration. The charge does not stand alone; it is always charged with an underlying violent or drug offense. Federal investigative agencies — including the FBI, ATF, DEA, and HSI — routinely build these cases, and the U.S. Attorney’s Office brings the indictment. Because the statute punishes the firearm use separately and consecutively, even a first‑time offender who pleads guilty to the underlying crime can face decades of extra time solely for the firearm count.

Federal firearm cases differ from state gun charges in several important ways. There is no parole in the federal system. The government must prove the firearm was possessed “in furtherance” of the crime, and the definition of “crime of violence” is litigated frequently. The U.S. District Courts in Alexandria, Richmond, Baltimore, Greenbelt, Washington, Newark, Camden, Brooklyn, and Buffalo — among others — handle these prosecutions. Mr. Sris and the firm’s Of Counsel attorneys have appeared in federal courts throughout the region and understand the procedural and strategic demands of the federal system. The firm maintains locations in Virginia, Maryland, DC, New Jersey, and New York, enabling convenient access for clients facing federal charges anywhere in the five‑state area. By appointment only; call (888) 437‑7747 to schedule.

How Mr. Sris and the Firm’s Of Counsel Attorneys Handle Federal Firearm Cases

Every federal firearm case begins with a thorough review of the government’s evidence, including the indictment, discovery materials, and any prior statements. The defense team examines whether law enforcement obtained the firearm evidence lawfully — potential Fourth Amendment violations, invalid search warrants, or improper traffic stops can lead to suppression of critical evidence. Mr. Sris and the firm’s Of Counsel attorneys also evaluate whether the charged predicate offense qualifies as a “crime of violence” under the Supreme Court’s evolving categorical‑approach jurisprudence. If the underlying offense does not meet the legal definition, the § 924(c) count may be dismissed.

Pre‑indictment representation is often the most valuable phase. Before charges are filed, counsel can engage with the prosecutor and the case agent, present mitigating facts, and sometimes persuade the government not to add a firearm count. If an indictment has already been returned, the defense team prepares for detention hearings, negotiates potential plea agreements that avoid the mandatory minimum, or litigates contested matters through trial. Throughout the process, the firm’s attorneys focus on protecting the client’s rights and seeking favorable outcomes under the circumstances.

About Mr. Sris and the Firm’s Of Counsel Attorneys

Mr. Sris, Owner and Founder of Law Offices Of SRIS, P.C., has practiced federal criminal defense since 1997. A former prosecutor, he brings firsthand insight into how the government builds and presents its cases. Mr. Sris is admitted in Virginia, Maryland, the District of Columbia, New Jersey, and New York — one of the few private practitioners authorized to appear in federal court across all five jurisdictions. His background in accounting and information systems is particularly valuable in complex firearm cases that involve financial crimes, electronic evidence, or technical forensic analysis.

Mr. Sris testified before the Virginia House Courts of Justice Committee in support of 2019 HB 635 (chief patron Del. David Bulova). The firm’s Of Counsel attorneys are experienced trial lawyers, several of whom previously served as prosecutors or federal law‑enforcement officers. Together, they bring extensive combined legal experience to every federal firearm matter. Results may vary.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is “use of a firearm in a crime of violence” under federal law?

It is a federal offense under 18 U.S.C. § 924(c) that punishes the use, carrying, or possession of a firearm during and in relation to any crime of violence or drug trafficking crime, with mandatory consecutive prison time. The charge enhances an underlying crime. The government must prove the firearm was actively employed or possessed “in furtherance” of the violent or drug offense. Because it carries a consecutive sentence, a conviction can dramatically lengthen the total term of incarceration.

Do I need a federal criminal defense lawyer for a firearm charge?

Yes, immediately. Federal firearm charges are prosecuted by the U.S. Attorney’s Office with substantial investigative resources, and the procedures and sentencing rules differ markedly from state court. A defense attorney experienced in federal practice can assess the indictment, identify suppression issues, argue against detention, and negotiate with federal prosecutors before a case solidifies. To discuss your situation, contact Law Offices Of SRIS, P.C. at (888) 437‑7747.

What are the potential penalties for a § 924(c) conviction?

The penalties are severe and include mandatory consecutive incarceration. The exact sentence turns on the type of firearm, how it was used, and the defendant’s criminal history. The court also considers the advisory U.S. Sentencing Guidelines. Because the mandatory time must be served consecutively to any other sentence, the total exposure often far exceeds the punishment for the underlying crime alone. An experienced attorney can explain the specific exposure in your case.

How does a federal firearm case differ from a state gun charge?

Federal cases are brought in U.S. District Court, governed by the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, and sentenced under the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines, with no possibility of parole. The investigative resources — including federal grand juries — are broader, and mandatory minimum statutes frequently apply. State‑court experience does not automatically translate to the federal arena, making it essential to retain counsel familiar with federal practice. For a consultation, reach Law Offices Of SRIS, P.C. at (888) 437‑7747.

What should I do if I am under investigation for a federal firearm offense?

Do not speak with law enforcement without counsel present. Retain an experienced federal criminal defense attorney as early as possible. Pre‑indictment representation can be the difference between a charge that carries a mandatory minimum and a resolution that avoids it. Preserve any documents or electronic evidence, and do not discuss the facts with anyone other than your lawyer. Mr. Sris and the firm’s Of Counsel attorneys can guide you through the investigation stage.

Can federal firearm charges be challenged before trial?

Yes. Common pre‑trial challenges include motions to suppress evidence, arguments that the predicate offense does not qualify as a “crime of violence,” and requests for dismissal based on constitutional violations. The categorical approach used by federal courts to define “crime of violence” is complex and subject to ongoing litigation. An attorney who stays current on these developments can identify arguments that may lead to dismissal or reduction of the firearm count.

Internal Link Recommendations

Learn more about our federal defense practice in specific jurisdictions:

Authoritative Sources

For official information on the federal statute, consult these primary sources:

Reviewed by Mr. Sris, Owner and Founder

Admitted in Virginia, Maryland, District of Columbia, New Jersey, and New York

Practicing since 1997

Last reviewed: July 2026

Attorney advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.

Case results depend on a variety of factors unique to each case.

Results may vary.